Navigation

Art and Anthropology- from archive to future

On 9th March, Goldsmiths Anthropology Department hosted a screening event, curated by Matthew Stock, at the Nunnery Gallery. The screening featured the work of students in our BA Visual Practice program as well as from two staff members, Ricardo Leizaola and Gabriel Dattatreyan. The theme for the screening was the archives, dovetailing with the exhibition at the Nunnery titled Traces of the Futurewhich engaged with the notion of the archive by examining the material remains of the Amani Hill Research Station in the Tanzanian Rainforest as a site where future and past meet. The screening was followed by a panel discussion with Goldsmiths staff, Sophie Day, Martyn Wemyss, Mathew Stock, Ricardo Leizaola, and Gabriel Dattatreyan, regarding the import of the archives for anthropological research and the ways in which the archive, as a materialized concept, can function as a meeting place for artists, anthropologists and historians.

In the weeks that follow we will provide a link to a selection of the student films which were shown at the exhibition. Each of the films were chosen for this blog as exemplars of the way in which the freely available digital archives of the internet can be utilised to produce critical and engaging work.

Black Orpheus, by Adefemi Bogulaye

Art and Anthropology- from archive to future

 

“I pose an ambitious question: What constitutes the good society” – Interview with Professor Pat Caplan regarding her forthcoming lecture at the University of Oxford

Written by Professor Pat Caplan & Sifa Mustafa

Emeritus Professor Pat Caplan, Department of Anthropology,  will be delivering the annual Mary Douglas Memorial Lecture at the University of Oxford on Wednesday 24th May entitled: Gifts, entitlements, benefits and surplus: interrogating food poverty and food aid in the UK 

Tell us a little bit about the annual Mary Douglas memorial lectures and how you have become involved

The anthropologist Professor Dame Mary Douglas died in 2007, after writing over 20 books and numerous articles, and teaching in both the UK and the USA. Her interests were wide and varied: symbolism and cosmology; pollution and taboo; consumption and communication; perception; risk and danger, trust and blame; economy and social policy; boundaries, inclusion and exclusion. She sometimes drew on her own early fieldwork in the Congo, but she also made much use of the Old Testament, especially in the latter part of her life. While she published acclaimed academic works, many of which were read and cited outside of her discipline, she also frequently wrote for a lay audience in such venues as the Times Literary Supplement. In this respect, she was also a public intellectual.

The Memorial lecture was set up four years ago as a joint venture between University College London, where Mary Douglas taught for many years, and the University of Oxford, where she originally trained. Its purpose is to present anthropological issues, particularly those which interested Douglas, to a lay audience. Two of the previous lecturers, Paul Richards (2014) and Michael Thompson (2016), were originally students of Douglas at UCL. I was not, but perhaps it’s noteworthy that I am the first woman to give the memorial lecture. I was told that the reason for inviting me was that I had worked on some of the same themes, notably food and risk.

Could you tell us about the lecture you will be delivering on 24th May?

I pose an ambitious question: what constitutes the good society? Is it one in which the state takes primary responsibility for the welfare of its citizens, or one in which the duty of care is handed over largely to the private and/or third or voluntary sectors? How can anthropologists contribute to the debates surrounding such questions? To address them I examine the case of food poverty in the UK and the solutions presently on offer. As Douglas noted, food is never just feed, and in order to comprehend some aspects of the contemporary situation we must attempt to grasp how a range of institutions such as food banks, the food industry and the state ‘think’ about food poverty, what they do about it and why, and how these actors are inter-related

Has Mary Douglas’ work influenced any of your own research?

Like virtually all anthropologists I have long been familiar with her two early and famous books: Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo (1966) and Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology (1970). In the course of writing this lecture, I’ve read more of her work, but because she has an assiduous intellectual executor, Richard Fardon, even more books have appeared since her death, while another written by three of her ex-students is currently in press!

When I was teaching fulltime at Goldsmiths I set up a course on the anthropology of food which ran for a long time. Here I made much use of Douglas’ work on the topic, one to which she kept returning in different contexts. She was adept in making use of and analysing the most mundane aspects of food, such as a witty article written with one of her students, Michael Nicod, ‘Taking the biscuit’ which was published in the New Statesman in 1974.

Later, I developed an interest in risk arising out of my research on the social effects of BSE and organised a seminar series which was later published a book (Risk Revisited 2000). The ‘revisited’ part of the title was because the contributors to this edited collection all made use of but also critiqued Douglas’ work on risk. Sadly, she had turned down our invitation to contribute a chapter herself because she said she wanted to focus on her Old Testament work.

Can you highlight how anthropologists can contribute to bringing these debates to the forefront of public consciousness?

One of the problems with much academic research is that it is primarily written for and read by other academics. That’s all well and good, but we need to find ways of communicating with a wider audience through a variety of media: newspapers, websites, blogs, short articles in magazines, film-making and of course teaching. We should be asking ourselves ‘what is our research for and who is it for?’ Is it going to make a difference not only to us and our discipline but also to other people, including those whom we’re researching?

What advice would you give to Goldsmiths students who are currently looking into similar research themes?

 I think I’d want to say to a student as follows: first read (critically of course) as much of the literature on the topic as possible, then think about how you want to address the questions which it raises. Is this through the use of ‘big data’ or through more ethnographic approaches at the micro-level? Or both? It’s good to do some original research but you want to be sure you are not just re-inventing the wheel!

Learn how to practice active listening, with lots of open-ended questions. Think about how you can connect the lives of the people you talk to with wider social contexts. Don’t be afraid to follow your nose and see where the data lead you, which may be a different place from where you started.

For more information, see the talks’ flier

The School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography presents the Mary Douglas Memorial Lecture, Wednesday 24th May 2017, 18:00, Mary Ogilvie Lecture Theatre, St Anne’s College 56 Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HS

For queries or to register to attend please contact: stacey.richardson@insis.ox.ac.uk 

Student Volunteer opportunity – Open Book

About Open Book:

Open Book is an organisation working largely within Goldsmiths, but with other partner universities to enable access to higher education for students who have experienced multiple profound disadvantage such as mental health problems, homelessness, imprisonment, inadequate or interrupted early education etc. We run informal classes here and at other sites across London, and are developing education projects within local prisons.

More information: http://www.gold.ac.uk/open-book/

About the project:

We are looking for students to participate in a series of ten-week prison education projects, following our successful pilot in HMP Isis, Thamesmead.

The project involves taking part as a “co-learner” in classes at prison sites in the south London area. We run ten-week modules in a variety of humanities and social science subjects, engaging prisoners in higher level education, to encourage them to expand their horizons and consider the possibility of University study during and after their sentence.

Your role will be to participate actively in the classes, and encourage and support learners to develop and use critical and analytical skills, and to experience a taste of university education practices. We will ask you to complete a short reading before each class, and sometimes to contribute to some on line research between classes. You will also keep short journal entries about your experience, and use these to contribute to an evaluation survey at the end of the module.

What do previous students say about the project?

“I had the opportunity to be part of some passionate and open discussions, not just limited to topics of education, and heard perspectives that often surprised and interested me. It isn’t all upbeat, life changing, inspiring words. But sometimes it is enough to see that students, both inside and outside learners, face similar discouragements and challenges, though of course, from different sources.”

“I was able to follow and learn about an area of study that was completely foreign to me. Being in the prison also allows for one to see and hear what is going on behind all that the media has fed us and perceived opinions.”

“A unique experience that introduced me to great friends and helped eliminate prejudices I had previously held. If you’re interested in gaining an insight into a world beyond your own while also studying relevant and interesting topics then Open Book is for you.”

Responsibilities:

  • Regular participation in weekly workshops, with some limited “homework” following up research questions which arise in the class. You will be asked to read something before coming to class and we will then discuss the reading in class. You will be asked to keep a field diary while on the project, recording your thoughts about what you have learned.
  • You will contribute small sections to the final project evaluation, and may be asked to attend an interview with our evaluation researcher after the end of the module.

What do I get out of it?

You will learn critical and analytical social science and humanities related skills that will benefit your own studies and make you think. You will meet a diverse range of people who will challenge your preconceptions. You will have a lot of fun, and build personal skills, as well as making a great contribution to your CV, and to your HEAR record.

Person specification:

  • Current Goldsmiths student
  • Available and committed to attend half a day a week for 10 weeks from mid June 2017
  • Available to attend compulsory briefing session at Goldsmiths in early May (we will work around the exam timetable)
  • Open minded, interested in challenging your own perceptions and learning in an open and egalitarian way

Application process:

Please submit a short (2 page maximum) CV with a 250 word application communicating why you are interested in the role. It will be an advantage in applying if you have relevant prior life experience. The deadline for applications are April 25th 2017

Applications and CVs should be sent Sarah Lambert at s.lambert@gold.ac.uk.  After an initial sifting, potential participants will be invited to one of two briefing session in early May, which will also serve as the final selection process. Successful applicants will be notified within a week of the briefing.