Primary page content

Theatre Blueprint Podcast – Inclusion and Design

Episode 12 – E.M Parry intersections of design and arts

 

To wrap up this three episode mini-series on theatre design, Drew talks to E.M. Parry, a transgender, trans-disciplinary artist, working and playing across scenography, performance, drag and visual art. Flitting between genres and platforms,they work with, through and for the queer body, squinting at history, flirting with ghosts and the things that go bump in the margins.

 

Great insights in to the non-linear process of theatre-making and  overcoming the linear process that is sometimes imposed. https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/theatre-blueprint/id1652858652#episodeGuid=d17dc7f8-4496-402c-b999-d155de55cbd1

 

Credits:

Interview: E. M Parry

Presented and co-produced by Drew McOnie and Siân Prime

Produced and edited by Scratch Post Productions

Music: “Seize the Day” by Andrey Rossi – made available by uppbeat.io

 

The Theatre Blueprint is a collaboration between The McOnie Company and SYNAPSE, the programme of business development support at Goldsmiths, University of London.

Parliamentary engagement, academics and ‘At risk: our creative future’

Dr Martin Smith

Visiting Fellow in Creative Industries, Goldsmiths, University of London

The report of the enquiry into the state of the UK’s creative industries entitled ‘At risk: our creative future’ (parliament.uk) which was published on 17th January by the Communications and Digital Committee of the House of Lords, raises a number of interesting questions about Parliamentary lobbying and the role of university academics in influencing public policy.  Leaving aside the hard-hitting nature of the report itself, four questions immediately come to mind.  First, who was engaged in making representations to the Committee and thus influencing its recommendations?  Second, is this kind of engagement generally effective?  Third, is it worth doing beyond consideration of direct political outcomes?  And, finally, will the representations prompted by this particular enquiry have any significant impact on government policy for the creative sector?

Who does it?

The report of the recent Lords enquiry is, in effect, a horizon scanning exercise on the future of the UK’s cultural sector and ‘creative industries’ and is monumentally ambitious, ranging in scope from IP protection and cultural exports to skills shortages and the impact of artificial intelligence on human creativity. The list of organisations which provided written evidence is instructive – a roll-call of the UK’s main creative sector trade associations, research entities and interest groups. The list includes pan-sector intermediary and research bodies (Creative UK and the UKRI-supported Policy and Evidence Centre (PEC) respectively), industry-specific trade representatives (for example the Design Council and the Advertising Association) as well as public funders (Arts Council England), training bodies (ScreenSkills) and one internet platform (Patreon).  Submissions from arts-heavy universities sit alongside others from research councils, individual academics and a prominent trade union (Equity).  The missing dimension in this panoply of representation is primarily financial and commercial: there are no submissions from banks, venture capitalists or other investment firms, for whom such activity is never an operational corporate priority in an arts-related or creative sector policy context. 

Parliamentary Select Committees usually take oral evidence based on the perceived quality of written submissions.  The most interesting (or perhaps opinionated) evidence providers are invited to be cross examined by members on the Parliamentary record.  This has become an important and competitive process for universities and academics within the framework of the ‘public engagement’ agenda (although few of us could ever compete dramatically with Ai-Da the robot artist who, accompanied by her developer Aidan Mellor, gave stunning ‘evidence’ to the Lords enquiry on 11th October 2022, a Parliamentary first).  Committees then draw on the written and oral evidence provided to them in making their analysis, reaching their conclusions and forming recommendations before sending their reports for official publication.

Is it effective?

An earlier generation of scholars in the disciplines of politics and public administration, with Professors Jeremy Richardson (Oxford) and the late Grant Jordan (Aberdeen) prominent amongst them, put the subject of ‘lobbying’ firmly on the academic map in the 1980s and 1990s, supported by the Political Studies Association and other professional associations and specialist journals.  

From a practitioner’s perspective (I previously worked as a Parliamentary lobbyist for the National Consumer Council and subsequently ran a commercial lobbying company), this issue of effectiveness nonetheless remains problematic.  The policy-influencing and legislative context is complex and highly variable depending on the specifics of election outcomes, voting numbers and control of Parliamentary business.  Crucial distinctions must be drawn between the purpose and processes of Public Bill Committees (in examining draft legislation) and Select Committees (in scrutinising the work of government), between primary and secondary legislation and between the procedures and debating styles of the two Houses of Parliament, which are quite different.   

Two general observations apply.  First, the high-minded pursuit of research-driven, evidence based policy-making remains an arena of intense frustration for academics, think tankers and other interest groups alike.  When it ‘works’ (which might crudely be expressed as excellent research plus high level lobbying delivers successful result/new intervention/change in the law) few experiences are more satisfying.  I’ve seen this at very close quarters on issues as diverse as unsafe imported childrens’ toys (banned by means of a Private Member’s Bill in 1986) and the introduction in finance legislation of the UK’s animation tax credit (in 2013, which staunched an exodus of British talent to Ireland and Canada).  But far more frequently such successful outcomes are not achieved for one or other of many reasons, including conflict with Treasury or Cabinet Office policy orthodoxy, poor tactics, wavering ministerial commitment, lack of Parliamentary time and filibustering.

Second, most lobbyists tend greatly to overstate their influence.  In my experience this judgment applies equally to pressure groups, trade associations and independent commercial lobbyists – it goes with the territory.  The most effective lobbyists are often people you never hear about: they have the good sense to stay out of the bragging game even though that may not help in drumming up business. 

Is it worth doing?  

We live in a click-driven age characterised by the ubiquity of SurveyMonkey and the dictates of the marketing team.  In universities the requirements of REF procedures ensure that this is an operating environment in which academics must engage.  Research reports and ‘impact’ studies flood policy-makers’ desks with terrifying regularity.  It sometimes appears that the authors of these reports are reluctant to distinguish between outputs (as many as possible) and outcomes (achieving substantive changes to public policy – very rare) because of the nature of the incentives in place.  This can distort any hard-headed understanding of the meaning of ‘evaluation’.  In the Parliamentary world, by contrast, ‘success’ and ‘failure’ are more easily determined.  When I worked in the Committee Corridor of the House of Commons promoting consumer-driven amendments to government bills, I was acutely aware on a daily basis that there is a profound difference between ‘feeling good’ about one’s work and achieving objective change.

Equally, in the Parliamentary context, any assessment of the role of Select Committees in taking evidence and influencing policy must be finely nuanced.  The brutal fact is that hundreds of Parliamentary reports, many of them excellent, gather dust and deliver nothing by way of policy change.  But this, arguably, is to take too narrow a view of impact as regards the evolution of the policy environment.  Returning to the specific context of the current Lords enquiry into At risk: our Creative Future’, the Committee has performed a great public service by amassing a large body of up-to-date evidence on the condition and prospects of, and challenges faced by, the UK’s creative sector, all of it publicly accessible.  A number of academics, from ICCE and elsewhere, have made authoritative contributions to sit alongside those made by industry representatives, ministers and officials.  So yes, therefore, for academics it is worth making the effort to engage in their wider role as public intellectuals.

Such Parliamentary representation may not always deliver direct policy outcomes, but at its best it can profoundly change the business environment and deliver indirect impact.  A particularly good example is provided by the work of the Culture Select Committee in the lower House on music streaming and artists’ remuneration.  This work is widely regarded as definitive: although it has yet to deliver concrete changes in the market for music rights and improvements to artist remuneration, it led directly to an investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).  The policy and commercial environments in which these matters are negotiated has, by general consent, been radically transformed over a two year period as a result of the Committee’s work.

Outcomes of At risk: our creative future’?

One distinguishing feature of Lords Select Committees is that they are generally more expert and thus more incisive than their Commons equivalents.  The membership of the Communications and Digital Committee includes a former Culture Minister (Lord Vaizey), a former Director General of the BBC (Lord Hall), a former ballet dancer and creative director of the Royal Opera House (Baroness Bull) and the current chair of publishing firm Random House UK (Baroness Rebuck), amongst others.  It is chaired by Baroness Stowell, herself a former BBC Head of Corporate Affairs, who has sought to position the Committee’s new report as an input into another, more high profile and consequential document, also due out later this year (March 2023), in the form of a ‘Sector Vision’ for the creative industries to be published by the government in collaboration with the Creative Industries Council (CIC), chaired by Sir Peter Bazalgette.

The publication of this ‘Sector Vision’ has been much delayed due to last year’s political turmoil, ministerial turnover within the lead government department, the DCMS and, allegedly, disputes between ministers in DCMS and BEIS (the industry department).  Its contents have been partially trailed by Sir Peter himself in oral evidence to the Lords’ enquiry, but its wider substance is eagerly anticipated, not least because Sir Peter was himself the principal author of an influential report on much the same subject matter in 2017.  

By the end of winter, with both reports then in the public arena, we should be in a better position to judge who is influencing whom and also the answer to a particularly fascinating policy question: how does a ‘Sector Vision’ for the creative industries differ from the ‘Sector Strategy’ published by the last government in 2018?  

MS

Design: Scenic & Costume – Theatre Blueprint Podcast

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/theatre-blueprint/id1652858652#episodeGuid=3bf49ea3-b432-4815-959e-b18e85160bd5

At a time when we need to continue to explore how we can support people to find new routes in to the creative industries, Drew and Siân continue to explore what skills, attributes and knowledge is needed to gain a career in theatre.. and they explore how people have found their way in to employment.

 

In this episode we continue finding out about the process of designing for theatre. Drew McOnie is joined by set and costume designer Ryan Dawson Laight who works with his clients from initial design concept, through to final production, using a style that is born out of the unique collaborations that occur on each project.

 

Credits:

Interview: Ryan Dawson Laight

Presented and co-produced by Drew McOnie and Siân Prime

Produced and edited by Scratch Post Productions

Music: “Seize the Day” by Andrey Rossi – made available by uppbeat.io

The Theatre Blueprint is a collaboration between The McOnie Company and SYNAPSE, the programme of business development support at Goldsmiths, University of London.

Collaboration at the heart of the process: Machel Ross – Episode 9

 

This week, Machel Ross joins Drew McOnie to talk about her experience working in the theatre industry. Machel is a Dominican American director and creative collaborator based in NYC, who specialises in the development of new work and aesthetic world building. This fascinating and  energising episode is a perfect “in-between” the old and new year. https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/artistic-leadership-collaboration-at-the-heart/id1652858652?i=1000590592273

 

Credits:

Interview: Machel Ross

Presented and co-produced by Drew McOnie and Siân Prime

Produced and edited by Scratch Post Productions

Music: “Seize the Day” by Andrey Rossi – made available by uppbeat.io

 

The Theatre Blueprint is a collaboration between The McOnie Company and SYNAPSE, the programme of business development support at Goldsmiths, University of London.

Developing new pathways in the profession: Theatre Blueprint Podcast

EPISODE 8 – Developing new pathways in the profession

 

In this episode, Drew McOnie talks to Julia Cheng, a creative director, choreographer and dance artist who works nationally and internationally. Julia is the Founder of House of Absolute which cultivates the preservation of wisdom within art. It endeavours to dismantle systems of oppression advocating for communities and cultures, centred by the multi-continental values of Asia, Africa and the Pacific. Julia is also the choreographer of West End’s Cabaret at the Kit Kat Club 2022, a judge and mentor for BBC Young Dancer and mentor for the biggest UK Hip Hop Festival, Breakin’ Convention.

 

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/theatre-blueprint/id1652858652?i=1000589817318

Credits:

Interview: Julia Cheng

Presented and co-produced by Drew McOnie and Siân Prime

Produced and edited by Scratch Post Productions

Music: “Seize the Day” by Andrey Rossi – made available by uppbeat.io

 

The Theatre Blueprint is a collaboration between The McOnie Company and SYNAPSE, the programme of business development support at Goldsmiths, University of London.

 

Developing work through association – more than a collaboration

Theatre Blueprint Podcast EPISODE 7 – Developing work through association – more than a collaboration

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/artistic-leadership-developing-work-through-association/id1652858652?i=1000588762332

 

The next three episodes of the Theatre Blueprint podcast are dedicated to demystifying Artistic Leadership and kicks off with meeting Ebony Molina, Associate Artistic Director of the McOnie Company who shares her thoughts on her career, her experience and what goes into creative artistic direction.

 

Credits:

Interview: Ebony Molina

Presented and co-produced by Drew McOnie and Siân Prime

Produced and edited by Scratch Post Productions

Music: “Seize the Day” by Andrey Rossi – made available by uppbeat.io

 

The Theatre Blueprint is a collaboration between The McOnie Company and SYNAPSE, the programme of business development support at Goldsmiths, University of London.

Directing space, people, stories: Theatre Blueprint Podcast

EPISODE 6 – Directing space, people, stories

 

Timothy Sheader, Artistic Director of Regent’s Park Theatre, joins the Theatre Blueprint podcast this week and shares with Drew McOnie his insights into bringing ideas to life. He was appointed to his role in 2007 and over the last 10 years, the theatre’s productions have won seven Olivier Awards, three Evening Standard Awards and six WhatsOnStage awards. 

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-idea-directing-space-people-stories/id1652858652?i=1000587671637

Credits:

Interview: Timothy Sheader

Presented and co-produced by Drew McOnie and Siân Prime

Produced and edited by Scratch Post Productions

Music: “Seize the Day” by Andrey Rossi – made available by uppbeat.io

 

The Theatre Blueprint is a collaboration between The McOnie Company and SYNAPSE, the programme of business development support at Goldsmiths, University of London.

Collaboration and Interpretation: Theatre BluePrint Podcast

EPISODE 5 – Deepening storytelling

 

The Theatre Blueprint podcast continues excavating how an idea is brought to the stage. In this episode, Drew talks to British writer, director and dramaturg Uzma Hameed about bringing stories to life.  This is a delicate and  beautiful conversation, exploring how artforms are translated and  how the collaborative act can be guided. 

 

Credits:

 

Interview: Uzma Hameed

Presented and co-produced by Drew McOnie and Siân Prime

Produced and edited by Scratch Post Productions

Music: “Seize the Day” by Andrey Rossi – made available by uppbeat.io

 

The Theatre Blueprint is a collaboration between The McOnie Company and SYNAPSE, the programme of business development support at Goldsmiths, University of London.

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/theatre-blueprint/id1652858652?i=1000586921149

Theatre Blueprint Podcast: The Idea and Collaboration

We are moving to releasing an episode of the podcast a week – we’re delighted to have so many listeners already, thank you.

 

The next three episodes of the Theatre Blueprint delve into how an initial idea is brought to life. This week Drew McOnie speaks to award-winning composer and lyricist Grant Olding, who writes and produces music for stage, tv and film.

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-idea-collaboration-across-artforms/id1652858652?i=1000586069999

 

Credits:

 

Interview: Grant Olding

Presented and co-produced by Drew McOnie and Siân Prime

Produced and edited by Scratch Post Productions

Music: “Seize the Day” by Andrey Rossi – made available by uppbeat.io

 

The Theatre Blueprint is a collaboration between The McOnie Company and SYNAPSE, the programme of business development support at Goldsmiths, University of London.

ENCATC Research Award 2022

Last month, Dr Kathrin Schmidt won the ENCATC (European network on cultural management and policy) Research Award 2022 for her PhD research ‘Performing Salone: The impact of local and global flows on the aesthetics and ecology of contemporary Krio theatre in Sierra Leone’. Kathrin completed her PhD last year, under the supervision of Dr Shela Sheikh at the Department of Media, Communications and Cultural Studies and Dr Carla Figueira at ICCE.

Her thesis analysed contemporary Krio theatre in Sierra Leone (‘Salone’ in the country’s lingua franca Krio) within the context of local and global flows of people, media, images, technologies, finance and ideas, and ensuing hybridisation. Based on extensive qualitative research in Sierra Leone, read through the lens of postcolonial cultural studies, cultural policy and political economy, the thesis examines the development of cultural and creative industries from the perspective of Sierra Leonean theatre in the context of macro- and microcosmic processes and in particular in relation to the development industry (currently the main funder of Krio theatre activities). Her thesis thus highlights the interconnectedness and relationships between the micro and the macro-levels of cultural production, between the local and the global and between aesthetics, politics, policy, economy, governance structures and history.

Despite the enormously rich and diverse cultural life across Africa, there is not enough research to help understand how cultural productions in diverse African contexts can be better supported, so that artists can help change narratives and shape futures while earning a good living. So it is very good to see more thorough empirical work on the arts in a specific African context and in relation to the social, political and economic conditions they are embedded in and shaped by.

Kathrin’s findings do not pretend to suggest a magic formula to ‘save’ theatre in Sierra Leone, but rather analyses how theatre and its wider ecology link to and represent our complex and globalised world. She offers poignant examples of the impact of local and global flows and of the current political economy – especially within the context of globalisation and commodification – on the policy, structural and institutional framework for theatre and cultural production more broadly in Sierra Leone; such as the disproportionally large role that international institutions play in the current ecology of culture in Sierra Leone, which gives them a de facto policy-making authority. As such, her research offers interesting insights into the global system that we currently live in, shaped by colonialism, its legacies and neoliberal globalisation, and stresses the importance and value of diverse epistemologies and the decolonisation of dominant discourses and practices in the fields of both culture and international development.

Congratulations, Kathrin, for winning the ENCATC award!